English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Dumont, sociologue classique ? Dumont, penseur de la modernité ? Nous tentons de répondre à ces questions en empruntant une voie originale, qui est de prendre en considération non seulement l'œuvre écrite mais aussi l'œuvre orale, dont un enseignement magistral de Philosophie sociale que Dumont donne au printemps 1968. L'opposition classique entre société traditionnelle et société technologique constitue l'armature de sa pensée. L'analyse que nous proposons tente d'éviter les deux pièges qui guettent toute lecture d'une œuvre, à savoir la célébration et la critique, pour emprunter une autre démarche, plus difficile, l'analyse sociologique : étude certes de l'époque et du contexte mais aussi de l'itinéraire qu'a suivi Dumont et des diverses positions dans le champ universitaire et intellectuel. Sociologue et philosophe, Dumont se retrouve dans une situation paradoxale : son ambition est d'« historiciser » sa société et sa situation personnelle, mais il cherche aussi à donner à cette histoire (et à son histoire) une portée universelle.Dumont, a classical sociologist ? Dumont, a thinker of modernity ? We try to answer these questions by following an original approach that aims to take into consideration not only his writings but also his speeches, including a master class in social philosophy given by Dumont in the spring of 1968. The classical opposition between traditional society and technological society provides the basic structure of his thought. The analysis proposed here aims to avoid the two traps into which one may fall in analysing writings, namely those of célébration or criticism. Instead, it seeks to follow another, more difficult approach, namely that of sociological analysis: the study of the period and of the context, of course, but also of the itinerary followed by Dumont and of the various positions in the academic and intellectual circles. A sociologist and a philosopher, Dumont finds himself in a paradoxical position: his ambition is to «historisize» his society and his personal situation, but he also seeks to give that history (and his history) a universal scope

Fernand Dumont et la modernité