English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the Bell Helicopter case, the government intervened under the Act to preserve agricultural land to grant Bell the necessary permission to install a helicopter assembly plant in an agricultural zone near Mirabel Airport notwithstanding a decision to contrary effect by the Commission de protection du territoire agricole du Québec (C.P.T.A.Q.). It did so even though the statute states that such decisions are « final and without appeal ». This article examines the role of the provincial government in protecting agricultural land and suggests several statutory changes that could ensure an effective role to the government while still respecting the independence of the C.P.T.A.Q

La finalité des décisions de la Commission de protection du territoire agricole du Québec : quelques réflexions sur l'affaire Bell Hélicoptères