English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Charles Taylor suggère aux philosophes politiques un retour à la discussion ontologique. Il faut, selon lui, retourner aux fondements des prescriptions politiques et discuter des valeurs qui guident constitutivement nos choix. Cette suggestion trouve son origine dans la conception de l’horizon de signification que défend C. Taylor. Pourtant, cette conception ne permet pas de comprendre comment les valeurs contraignent moralement les êtres humains, sauf si on lui juxtapose l’idée d’instinct moral qui ne se justifie qu’a posteriori, c’est-à-dire en regard d’une certaine nécessité.Charles Taylor argues that political philosophers should discuss ontological propositions. To explain how constitutive goods guide our choices, we must focus debate on the foundations of political advocacies. In fact, C. Taylor's "inescapable framework" conception leads to this proposition. This conception is, however, unable to account for the moral constraint which exists within political communities without supposing a moral instinct. The latter seems to get an a posteriori justification, i.e. stands in the explanation as an unfounded necessity

L’usage de la notion d’ontologie dans la philosophie politique de Charles Taylor