English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This review of recent developments in the field of sentencing in Canada begins byobserving that none of the recommendations of the Canadian Sentencing Commission wereimplemented, since the commission issued its report in 1987. This amounts to a prolongationof the status quo. We propose elements of explanation as to why there was no follow up tothe Commission's proposals. Second, we present a critical analysis of the latestconsultation package on sentencing and parole, that was put together by the federalDepartment of Justice in 1990. We argue that the proposed statement of purposes andprinciples of sentencing should priorize the different sentencing goals that it enumerates.We also point out that there is an unbalance between the sentencing and parole components ofthe permanent commission proposed by the Department of Justice. The sentencing component isrequired to make sentencing policy, whereas the parole component acts as an advisor to theNational Parole Board

Quelques notes sur la réforme de la détermination de la peine au Canada