English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article discusses the findings of empirical research into the working habits ofdefence attorneys. Contrary to what is implied by the current expression “plea bargaining”,it is not the plea but the sentence which is the real object of the negotiations takingplace between the prosecution and the defence. When no agreement is reached between theCrown prosecutor and the defence attorney, they resort to formal representations made beforethe judge during a sentencing hearing and argue for their conflicting recommendations.Hence, it is not a criminal trial but a formal sentencing hearing, where both parties arguetheir case, which is the outcome of a failure of the Crown and defence attorney to reach anegotiated agreement on the fate of a defendant

La négociation des sentences du point de vue des avocats de la défense