English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Based on the author's personal experience, he proposes consideration of thetheoretical choices offered Montreal criminologists over the past 25 years. At first, thesole object of criminology was the etiology and social treatment of crime. At the end of the60's and for the following ten years or so, there were many expressions of doubt both at thesocio-political level as well as concerning the social sciences and criminology as such. Themovements for the defence of minority rights and new theoretical orientations led the authorto question the production of norms and attribution of the «quatity» of deviant rather thanthe factors of delinquency. He explains here how from a criminology of acting out heeventually arrived at a criminology of social control. More in-depth analyses of punishmentand penal justice led the author to question the very existence of the entire criminaljustice system and, like L. Hulsman, to take an abolitionist position. He then describes howhe conceives the role of the clinician in this perspective

Évolution théorique en criminologie : l’histoire d’un cheminement