English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

C to bridge the gap between “what is known” and “what is done” have led to a small but growing body of literature on how research is used in policy and practice decisionmaking. Early models of research use focused on the autonomous production and passive transfer of research, describing linear, rational processes whereby research is conducted by a research “producer” and then “pushed” to a ready and waiting research “user” (Lavis, Robertson, Woodside, Mcleod, & Abelson, 2003). More recently, knowledge translation and exchange models have been promoted as potentially useful for examining the interactions among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.

Navigating the Complexity of Using Research in Policy and Practice Decisions [English and Spanish versions]