English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

<b>English Abstract:</b> The article looks primarily at the material comprised in the volume edited by A. Piszcz, Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries published in 2017 and based on that compares aspects of the disclosure of evidence issue in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. The purpose of this article is to look into how the process for the disclosure of evidence has evolved in eleven countries of the European Union in light of Directive 2014/104/EU. The article looks at six key issues with regard to disclosure of evidence in light of Directive 2014/104/EU: general procedural issues; procedure for the submission of evidence; criteria for the disclosure of evidence; restrictions on the disclosure of evidence; disclosure of evidence by parties other than the defendant; and consequences of the failure to comply with a request to submit evidence. The article relies on primary data from eleven EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe. <b>French Abstract:</b>L'article se focalise principalement sur le contenu du volume publié par A. Piszcz «Mise en œuvre de la Directive Dommages dans les pays d'Europe centrale et orientale» publiée en 2017 et à la base de cela compare les aspects de la divulgation des preuves en Bulgarie, en Croatie, en République tchèque, en Estonie, en Hongrie, en Lettonie, en Lituanie, en Pologne, en Roumanie, en Slovaquie et en Slovénie. Le but de cet article est d'examiner comment le processus de divulgation des preuves a évolué dans onze pays de l'Union européenne à la lumière de la Directive 2014/104/UE. L'article examine six questions clés concernant la divulgation de preuves à la lumière de la Directive 2014/104/UE: les questions de procédure générale; procédure de présentation des preuves; les critères de divulgation de la preuve; restrictions à la divulgation de la preuve; la divulgation de preuves par des parties autres que le défendeur; et les conséquences du non-respect d'une demande de présentation de preuves. L'article s'appuie sur des données primaires de onze pays de l'UE d'Europe centrale et orientale.

Disclosure of Evidence in Central and Eastern European Countries in Light of the Implementation of the Damages Directive