English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background:  Gastric cancer (GC) has a high mortality rate in cancer-related deaths worldwide. Currently, the pathogenesis of gastric cancer progression remains unclear. Here, we identified several vital candidate genes related to gastric cancer development and revealed the potential pathogenic mechanisms using integrated bioinformatics analysis.   Methods:  Two microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database integrated. Limma package was used to analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GC and matched normal specimens. DAVID was utilized to conduct Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG enrichment analysis. The relative expression of OLFM4, IGF2BP3, CLDN1 and MMP1were analyzed based on TCGA database provided by UALCAN. Western blot and quantitative real time PCR assay were performed to determine the protein and mRNA levels of OLFM4, IGF2BP3, CLDN1 and MMP1 in GC tissues and cell lines, respectively.   Results:  We downloaded the expression profiles of GSE103236 and GSE118897 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Two integrated microarray datasets were used to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and bioinformatics methods were used for in-depth analysis. After gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichments analysis, we identified 61 DEGs in common, of which the expression of 34 genes were elevated and 27 genes were decreased. GO analysis displayed that the biological functions of DEGs mainly focused on negative regulation of growth, fatty acid binding, cellular response to zinc ion and calcium-independent cell-cell adhesion. KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that these DEGs mainly related to the Wnt and tumor signaling pathway. Interestingly, we found 4 genes were most significantly upregulated in the DEGs, which were OLFM4, IGF2BP3, CLDN1 and MMP1. Then, we confirmed the upregulation of these genes in STAD based on sample types. In the final, western blot and qRT-PCR assay were performed to determine the protein and mRNA levels of OLFM4, IGF2BP3, CLDN1 and MMP1 in GC tissues and cell lines.   Conclusion:  In our study, using integrated bioinformatics to screen DEGs in gastric cancer could benefit us for understanding the pathogenic mechanism underlying gastric cancer progression. Meanwhile, we also identified four significantly upregulated genes in DEGs from both two datasets, which might be used as the biomarkers for early diagnosis and prevention of gastric cancer.

Integrated bioinformatics analysis for differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways identification in gastric cancer