English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

When considering the aquatic environmental conservation of a closed water body in which organic contamination is ongoing, it is important to study the occurrence mechanism of anaerobic organic matter decomposition such as denitrification in addition to both iron and sulfate reduction due to increasingly anoxic conditions in the aquatic environment. From the perspective of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N), phosphate phosphorus (PO4-P), sulfides, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), we herein present a quantitative evaluation of water quality dynamics near the water bottom under the anaerobic state in a laboratory environment. We modeled the ORP behavior at the bottom of the aquatic environment under anaerobic conditions by using a regression equation that applies a logistic curve and uses the number of days of continuous anoxic condition as the time axis. Specifically, the rate of ORP decrease was shown to be dependent on the concentration of NO3-N at the time of anoxic condition development. In addition, temporal changes in the decrease of NO3-N and increases of NH4-N, PO4-P, and sulfide were modeled with either linear or non-linear regressions. In particular, the properties of organic matter such as the ease and difficulty of degradation are shown to have a strong impact on the rate of PO4-P increase, whereas the production of sulfides increased with a higher concentration of TOC. Furthermore, the laboratory experiment showed that, in an actual aquatic environment with various coexisting redox reactions, the following reduction reactions take place under anaerobic conditions: denitrification, followed by iron reduction and then sulfate reduction. Each reaction is completed before the next one begins. In addition, when the concentration of DOC derived from humic acid is extremely high, even under an anoxic environment, ORP becomes positive and may lead to an oxidative state. Thus, we were able to incorporate the resultant measurements of PO4-P, sulfides and DOC to explain these mechanisms based on the experiment results. Keywords: Anoxic water; Dissolved oxygen; Oxidation-reduction potential; Sulfide; Nutrient salt 1 ÅÔ (` çqL4» qÍÎ o A ¡ ~ qWs rsAÛDqL i2 4 8 !B qQ x jxyz   2qi  R 3 2 ( qÍ Î 2 ü BH!B CD qÍÎ 2 qL !d@"#"= Q2r@$) vEç4% ̧ & ̧ '() "k  () 2qi   Kû !3 () *%2 (qL qÍÎ+,¶́ Ü ]= !d@"#"= qR ./ @AÐÑ Q2r@£_M8qÍÎ 2 0 ç1 Ù¢H B ×Ó ß=XA> !æ A i2 Óû H 2h '() () !d@ Q_3 @45 ÒÓ«3⁄4x=> ! !d@6/= i Ñ7 2Q ̈ (( )Å$)4 2()+ß(ORP) 1⁄4 X M8ÒÓ@ A* !qL=* o©@ $) +ß 1⁄4 ÏA2h 8 () '() () 0ãk94 8 ! ?r@£_Aì ̧ qL ORP pH Þ H ̧ ÒÓ ()Å$)4* M Ö B 4=S:T 2001V !d@ Q_3 @4 543⁄4¿=> ! M 48 ;qL= < =Q o>AC+ 5 ̧ 2()$)4?Í 3 $)@ ¢= !& ̧ A8(2005) "k AÚ ORP4eBA B f 4 3 v C@ X =>+ ORP #*(Q2r@$)  @45O=AD(ØÙ ° !N8A ;qL= ORP  3 X X ̧S:á¶E 1986V !d@Í Î"A> qLAW 3 @ 45AvH Ö£XF => !B CD ØÙYG X KT8 (2014) ÜÛ4*%2H HqI ÚÛAq Rl ã"kJ Ô 3 a«Aì ̧K_w Ý M8 ORP 2Q #kl #/hi "k /"k e B H qR./A @45 Ô(!O1⁄4 ! d@"#"= ORP ./ láp2 = ORP vEX i6/AW ] 2Q ¿ '2 1rK=45 (! M 48 uØÙ= Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems Vol.21/No.2/pp.13-21 Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems 1 LM r rNQ ÍÎqrO-P1Ð Master Course Student, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan 2 LM r rNQrØÙNRST Associate Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan (Corresponding Author) E-mail: mharada@bpes.kyushu-u.ac.jp 3 LM r rNQrØÙNST Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan 4 LM r rNQrØÙNUS Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan JOURNAL OF RAINWATER CATCHMENT SYSTEMS/VOL.21 NO.2 2016 ▇ 13 õ~@ i2AC % ()6/ +D q ́ V ÚÛA qR./æç AéêH O=A D  !B CDA qRWRXC Q2r@ QR./AvH ØÙ&X° 4Ü6=> ! 3B= !d@ÍÎ" X q ́V= 2()$ )AYùH qR./ C+ A3¢H ()A Z [q\  (]O;^ Ô(!B a«C+ K_ w Ý M8ORP 8 /hi #kl #/hi "k /"k 2Q eB H qR ./æçA @A45 (! B{= KT8(2014) i2' 8 /hi41⁄4cd=>  2h4õ~2 B 4 i6/= ORP ./Atu vwHB e _ (!N8A `á8(1989)ja£(1970) 2hj'( ) $)-d Qcd % vEç Æ B f !B 8 æO i2AD(' = 8 :bkcdj Q 3 Z !d@"# "= 2()$)A  tu vwH bcN ! 3 () 8 /hiA§ xy2¶ o Óû }Q~kkjÍ/ QAXd! i2' B 8 cd4!d@"#"= qR ./AvwHtu æO(3w¶éê Ô(! 2 \]XY >WNOPQRS* ^_`abc 2.1 XYde ]O;^A 1⁄4N 100cm Ýe 30cm #"pkZ[q \  (!B q\OA ;qL=[k~"kJ ( R Hfq 3 ë gNö 10cm q2ö 90cm C DAh Wd 20C iWj^]Ak= (!Ê 1 A fHCDA q lâãAC q\]è §WH B = ] 20cm4ö 30m " 70cm4ö 20m qW 2s 4rsN !B " i6/ + q\O AÈÉ 2qL=rsN 2q ÁÜ ( B A ! W R¶HfqA ·Ë ;^" # no pH !;^q\ hAW gqA ÛDR qrAC +4* () 6Ck= (Z q\O q4s-.B t (]=q\]è §W Â$ (!B qRl ã"kJ Â$'S; ^Â$'V (!Zp #+ ØÙ= . 4 uâ$ ;^"# £ 1⁄4 X ORP4 400mVÐd % ()6/4 10§]vÆN (~C Ñ7qRl ã" kJ !e (() ;^~C ö1Ê2;C=>(! qRl ã"kJ RÝ]q ÚÛAEÇÞ 8àA ~Þ ;¢ (!O1⁄4 EÇÞ = 0l" Ow@5 !qR.SModel6920 YSI/Nanotech8kV RÝ]ö 5cm ß=Ax qW DO pH ORP +dyz(EC) Þ áâã [k~"kJCD 20_= Ô(!uqR.= {A%DO+a4 8 B M8 DO Þ )|ç4̧ Þ 1⁄2djÁÜçX} !O( XdQ~ () :ââ4N B M8  (EÇÞ ;¢43⁄4¿=> ! O( ORP Þ +a E +a z2 H Zk[=Þ N (X =>+ qiB+aAC +ß (Eh)A  ! W Þ ­A 200 mV § B = Eh WWC3 ­ Ö B 4= ! ~Þ = 3Ê4 CD=RÝ]ö 5cm q âpâm k~  [k~"kJ , i(TOC) Í/ i(DOC) #kl # /hi (NH4 N) 8 /hi (NO3 N) "k /"k (PO4 P) :bk(SO4 ) 2Q ØÙ Ó q R_w ! (!B 8 _wã/ · #+=> ! O1⁄4 i Þ A %st1 2W`$ À%z+Þ ã/ TOC_w.S900@ Zk pqr8kV  (!O( NO3 N SO4 _w= :bk J/ ̈ (!N8A NH4 N PO4 P 2QA 3 ë $â/ #$p k()¶l"mákmpâ/ 9èkmpâ/  B 8 _wA_AAd.SDR5000 HACH 8kV  (!BB= 2Q _wã/ Þ ÚÛ 2 Q:bk(S2 => 4 ç"= 2qi(H2S) 2qi:bk(HS WCà 2'(FeS 3⁄4ç E 2QM8H u:bkXÑO ! ?A 2Qj SO4 ¶ xy2vE !AÑO ! M 48 ÈÉÊÉ 6A 2q 4 rsN CD qç 2qLAW X () û H 2qi 4tN (B æO SKT8 2014V SO4 2Q ~Þ ! §(!O( ;^A ([k~"kJq æ ¢AH ()A ;^Â$' 7 Chl.a Î /A Þ (! W 1  ~Þ A  qAC  ö  qß¤"4*(!;^~C #*(qß ¤" ö 15cm =>+ O(lâãAC §W ] ö 20cm=ëË (() qW 20m " q2 ;^ ̈Z=WWC3 70cmM8 55cmA2 (!(. B CD 2 a) ¡jM=> () RÝ]5cm qRl ã"kJAvwHtu X Ü ! ý 2.2 XYQR ØÙ= qRl ã"kJÂ$' qR"#S§" ¢~"#V4é 4uâ$SRun 1ÊRun 4VAÚ ] EÇ¶ ~Þ Ô(!uâ$ ¢~"# © 1 AO ) !,uâ$= (R £} À¤ K *{|AC+ ÜÛ4*%2 (HqIA [k ~"kJ (!© 2 AfHCDA uâ$AC R 2r @æç­ ¥  ° ̧ R ¦ 4;^a«A vwHtu a) úN !qR ¢~"# Hfq [k~"kJ_ ¶'~  B =£ (X =>+ Run 1ÊRun 4 "# §" #+=> ! O1⁄4 }Q~kk AÛD§° q A ÍÎ"AC+qX ́= i6/A +D xy2 ý Ê 1&ý ;^q\ ̈ :0â©Êý 14 ▇ JOURNAL OF RAINWATER CATCHMENT SYSTEMS/VOL.21 NO.2 2016 qL c Run 1 Run 2 "# £ (!Run 1= xy6/A> Q HqIA }Q~kk cd41⁄4 ÈÉA[k~"kJ (Hfq  (! Run 1 æ ,uâ$ = Chl.a4X1⁄4 B O(}Q~kkAC xyz ä+a745 a« xyz4¤cd=>+ æANO3 N4 w« => B 4 8 ! ã Run 2 É§ xy2Hq I c ] HqI é xy2qL= 11 A[k~"kJ (q  (!Run 2 æ Chl.a Ú@A1⁄4 X ¤qWj¤¬ tu AC+AsAÛDxyz ä+a7X° ̧ NO3 N 4> ÐdÍ%H B 4 8 ! B 8AÚ Run 3 Run 4= 5 ̄ ¶Í/ QAC 4ÅÔ (qL c (!Run 3= £} j­® K*AC+ ̄°± 2 ÈÉ %x qWs rs õ~@ i2 4tN HqI=[k~"kJ (!N8A Run 4 uHqIlK a7q  (!B K*q uqL Kû  W+ 5 £} Ñ7() Run 4 u â$ æ DOC 43 ́A1⁄4cd(DOC: 10.2mg/l => B 4 8 !O( Run 3 Runý 4A?# }Q~kk4° () xyz æANO3 N41⁄4 cd ¢~"#  ! W Run 1~Run 4 ; ^= (R uHqI=  (X => ! 3D 7fgD D 3.1 hij5k ORP TUlmD KT8(2014) 24*μ q2 8m HqI ÚÛA DO¶ORP EÇÝÞ ;¢ !d@"#"= ORP ./æçA Kláp #* éê (! 3 a« ORP ./ i6/4©Ç (6D§ " i©Ç6E tAÌÍ 3 ¿'2 Êý 2 AfHCD ©$ ä41 ̈ (·%=láp 2= B f (!ý max max min ) exp( 1 ) ( E t E E t E BB= max E (mV) ¶d@"#"= ORP ­ in m E (mV) !d@"#"= ORP "·­ ¢ ~­ E(0)AvH ·)â0âã max E M8 in m E l ORP ¤"-d 6(d 1 => !(. K_w Am (EÇÝÞáâã q2 5m 7m ß=AC X = q ́V  RÍÎ tu4Ú@AúN => !q ́V=  i ̧1 tuAC +!d@ 6/4õ~2 M 3 ́A% ()6/A +D !3B= B CD RÝ]q ORP ./æç A X%(1)Aì ̧K_w oç Ý M8é ê (! Ê 3 Ê 4 Auâ$ DO ORP qW pH EC EÇÞ a« fH!uÊC+ i~C ORP ¿' 2A Aéê (!, uâ$AW DO w»ëA ̄° DO 0 mg/l i6/AD(! B ~C ,uâ$= DO ̄°AÛD ORP 2 ý © 1: ;^"# Run 1ÊRun 4 qR¢~"# ! »ß Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Chl.a g/l 55.00 36.00 4.00 1.80 NO3 N mg/l 0.01 0.12 0.23 0.18 NH4 N mg/l 0.55 0.61 0.34 0.60 PO4 P mg/l 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.08 TOC mg/l 7.62 5.48 5.48 10.60 DOC mg/l 6.34 4.98 4.69 10.20 2Q g/l 13.00 23.50 25.50 30.00 SO42 mg/l 5.95 20.02 5.59 11.77 ý © 2: ;^"# R 2r@æç ! »ß Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 ORP mV 220.0 286.0 286.0 224.0 2Q mg/g 0.27 0.24 0.24 0.20 % ̄ % 11.85 10.17 10.17 10.71 EC mS/m 14.83 11.61 11.61 13.89 pH 6.46 6.66 6.66 7.02 ?2F ? 2 G H I B E (m V )

Experimental Study on Dynamics of Water Qualities under the Anaerobic State in an Organically Polluted Water Body