The Role of Non-Operative Strategies in the Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Author(s) -
Jai Dev Wig,
Vikas Gupta,
Rakesh Kochhar,
Rudra Prasad Doley,
Thakur Deen Yadav,
Kuchhangi Sureshchandra Poornachandra,
Kishore G. S. Bharathy,
Naveen Kalra
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pubmed
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1590-8577
DOI - 10.6092/1590-8577/3397
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous , intensive care unit , acute pancreatitis , context (archaeology) , surgery , pancreatitis , leukocytosis , catheter , prospective cohort study , intensive care , apache ii , intensive care medicine , paleontology , biology
Non-operative strategies are gaining preference in the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of a non-operative approach, including percutaneous drainage, in the management of severe acute pancreatitis.Prospective study.Tertiary care centre in India.Fifty consecutive patients with severe acute pancreatitis were managed in an intensive care unit.The patients were initially managed conservatively. Those with 5 cm, or more, of fluid collection having fever, leukocytosis or organ failure underwent percutaneous catheter drainage using a 10 Fr catheter. Those not responding underwent a necrosectomy. Depending on the outcome of their supportive care, the patients were divided into three groups: those responding to intensive care, those needing percutaneous catheter drainage and those requiring surgical intervention. Twelve patients were managed conservatively (Group 1) while 24 underwent percutaneous catheter drainage (Group 2), 9 of whom were not operated (Group 2a) and 15 of whom underwent necrosectomy (Group 2b). Fourteen patients were operated on directly (Group 3).Hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and mortality.Among patients requiring surgery, the patients in Group 2b had a shorter intensive care unit stay (22.1±11.1 days) as compared to the patients in Group 3 (25.0±15.6 days) and a longer interval to surgery, 30.7±8.9 days versus 25.4±8.5 days. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P=0.705 and P=0.133, respectively). The two groups did not differ in terms of mortality (5/15 versus 3/14; P=0.682).The use of percutaneous catheter drainage helped avoid or delay surgery in two-fifths of the patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom