English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

En este articulo se analiza el concepto de imperativo metanoetico que Peter Sloterdijk presenta en iHas de cambiar tu vida! Nuestro objetivo es iluminar la naturaleza de lo que, en trabajos anteriores, hemos denominado -a raiz de la obra de Bernard Suits-: razon ludica . Para ello, primero, expondremos y analizaremos el sentido del imperativo metanoetico en Sloterdijk, asi como los elementos principales de su razon ascetica. Segundo, mostraremos como ambos son consecuencia del analisis ontologico de corte heideggeriano en la que Sloterdijk basa su propuesta de filosofia moral. Tercero, presentaremos en terminos sloterdijkianos tanto el analisis ontologico de Suits, como el posible imperativo metanoetico que se desprenderia de su razon ludica. Por ultimo, centrandonos en el papel que Sloterdijk otorga a la figura del «ocioso», mostraremos las posibles conexiones entre Suits y Sloterdijk. Mostraremos la relacion que existe entre los imperativos ludicos y asceticos donde, ademas, el acto «jugar» recibe un papel central en la «respuesta a la pregunta por el ser».  In this article, we analyze Peter Sloterdijk’s concept of “metanoethical imperative” in You Must Change Your Life . Our goal is to shed light on what, by drawing on Bernard Suits, we call “ludic reason.” To do so, we will present and examine in depth the meaning of Sloterdijk’s metanoethical imperative, as well as the main features of his concept of “askesis.” Second, we will argue that both concepts are the result of the Heideggerian ontological principles underlying Sloterdijk’s moral philosophy. Third, we will provide a “Sloterdijkean” interpretation of Suits’ account of games by focusing on the metanoethical imperative that could be derived from the notion of the ludic reason. To conclude, we will focus on the role that the figure of the “Good-for-Nothing” plays in Sloterdijk’s account, showing connections between Suits’ and Sloterdijk’s approaches. We will argue that, in the philosophical approaches of both philosophers, the idea of game playing is closely tied to the “question on Being.”

Una crítica a la modernidad a partir de la “inutilidad” del juego. El imperativo metanoético de Sloterdijk y lo lúdico