English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The present contribution aims to illustrate the close relation between the role played by the idealized Gemeinschaft in some classical sociologists (as a critical element of modern societies’ ills) and the theoretical function of the “ideal communication community” as an a priori in Apel’s ethics (as a regulative principle of actual dialogic processes). With that aim, I will compare the possible future “ideal community” to the past “community life” of moral consensus. Now we live after the sociological Gemeinschaft (first sense of the preposition “after”) but we must go after the ideal communication community (second sense of “after”).

Tras la comunidad. De la Gemeinschaft sociológica a la “comunidad ideal de comunicación” en la ética de Apel