English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEl filosofo checo Karel Kosik (1926-2003) llevo a cabo en su obra una recepcion critica del pensamiento de Martin Heidegger. En determinados capitulos de Dialectica de lo concreto (1963), asi como en otros ensayos tardios, elaboro una critica de la analitica existencial heideggeriana, principalmente a la concepcion de la estructura del ser del Dasein como “preocupacion” o “cuidado” (Sorge). Nos ocupamos aqui de dilucidar el sentido y el alcance de esta critica a Ser y tiempo(1927). EnglishCzech philosopher Karel Kosik (1926-2003) carried out in his work a critical reception of Martin Heidegger’s thought. In some chapters of Dialectics of the Concrete (1963), as well as in other late essays, he elaborated a critique of Heidegger’s existential analytic, particulary to the conception of the structure of Dasein’s being as “concern” or “care” (Sorge). We deal here to elucidate the meaning and scope of this critique of Being and Time (1927).

¿Mundo fenoménico de la Sorge o mundo de la praxis humana? La crítica de Karel Kosík a la analítica existencial de Martin Heidegger