English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolEn el articulo se elabora una comparacion sobre la libertad en Sartre y en Ricœur a partir de la lectura que ambos realizan de los textos cartesianos. En «La liberte cartesienne», Sartre sostiene que la libertad creadora que Descartes ve en Dios no es otra cosa que la autentica libertad del hombre. En Lo voluntario y lo involuntario, Ricœur determina a partir de la generosidad cartesiana que «querer no es crear». Se argumenta que, valorado en su conjunto, el planteamiento de Descartes se asemeja mas a las tesis del consentimiento de Ricœur que a las del existencialismo de Sartre. EnglishThis paper carries out a comparison between Sartre’s and Ricoeur’s conceptions of freedom, based on their own interpretation of the Cartesian texts. In “La liberte cartesienne” (1947), Sartre argues that the creative freedom that Des-cartes observes in God is the genuine freedom of the human being. In Freedom and Nature (1950), Ricœur determines from the Cartesian generositythat “to will is not to create”. This paper argues that Descartes’ approach taken as a whole is more akin to Ricœur’s consent approach than Sartre’s existentialism theory

La libertad a debate: la lectura de los textos cartesianos en Sartre y Ricœur