English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Researchers have ,proposed ,that  people ,possess  different  love  schemas ,and ,that  these  schemas,may shape romantic,preferences and reactions to impending commitments.,  InStudy 1,  we  tested  two  hypotheses:  Hypothesis  1:  Men  and  women  will  prefer  potential  dates who  possess  an  “ideal”  love  schema  (i.e.,  the  secure).   Hypothesis  2:  If  the  ideal  is  unavailable, men  and  women  will  prefer  potential  dates  whose  love  schemas  are  similar  to  their own. In order to test these hypotheses, men and women from the University of Hawaii, who varied in love schemas, were asked to indicate their preferences for potential romantic partners who  varied  in  physical  attractiveness,  body  type,  and  love  schemas.   It  was  found  that people did indeed prefer the ideal (the secure) and (secondarily) those who were similar to them in attachment style—be it clingy, skittish, casual, or disinterested.    Study  2  was ,designed ,to  test ,Hypothesis  3:  Participants’  love  schemas ,will  shape  their  cognitions, feelings,  and  behaviors  when  they  find  themselves  on  the  brink  of  making  a  serious romantic commitment.  In order to test this hypothesis, men and women from the University of Hawaii were surveyed. Again, as predicted, it was found that the more strongly men and  women  endorsed  the  secure  schema,  the  more  calm  and  confident  (and  the  less  fearful and trapped) they felt when,confronting pending,commitments., The more,strongly they endorsed the clingy, skittish, fickle, casual,and uninterested schemas, the less confident and calm,and ,the  more ,fearful  and ,trapped ,they ,felt  when ,confronting ,an  impending  commitment.,    Recently,  social  psychologists  have  become  interested  in  the  impact  of  cognitive

Love Schemas, Preferences in Romantic Partners, and Reactions to Commitment