English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Probabilistic reasoning biases have been widely associated with levels of delusional belief ideation (Galbraith, Manktelow, &amp; Morris, 2010; Lincoln, Ziegler, Mehl, &amp; Rief, 2010; Speechley, Whitman, &amp; Woodward, 2010; White &amp; Mansell, 2009), however, little research has focused on biases occurring during every day reasoning (Galbraith, Manktelow, &amp; Morris, 2011), and moral and crime based reasoning (Wilkinson, Caulfield, &amp; Jones, 2014; Wilkinson, Jones, &amp; Caulfield, 2011). 235 participants were recruited across four experiments exploring crime based reasoning through different modalities and dual processing tasks. Study one explored delusional ideation when completing a visually presented crime based reasoning task. Study two explored the same task in an auditory presentation. Study three utilised a dual task paradigm to explore modality and executive functioning. Study four extended this paradigm to the auditory modality. The results indicated that modality and delusional ideation have a significant effect on individuals reasoning about violent and non-violent crime (p &lt; .05), which could have implication for the presentation of evidence in applied setting such as the courtroom.

Delusional ideation, cognitive processes and crime based reasoning