English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The question addressed in this contribution is how the stories about the patriarchs told in Gen 12-50 would resonate in the time of the exile? It was Gunkel who maintained that the patriarchal narrative should rather not be seen as belonging to the genre of historiography but to that of legend. It seems that this (deliberate?) vagueness on historical detail is yet another indicator that the patriarchal narratives were not meant to be historiography in the strict sense of the word, but was compiled for another reason in exilic times. A basic presupposition in this paper following the recent trend in scholarship will be that the Torah was formed during the exile. Texts where the patriarchs resurface in exilic texts from the prophetic literature (Isaiah 41:8, 51:1-3; Jer 33:25-26; Ezek 33:24) are briefly examined before some conclusions are made regarding the promise made to Abraham (Gen 12:1-3), the motif of entering and re-entering the land, living outside the land on foreign soil, the presence of Yahweh outside of the land, covenant, the genealogies in Gen 12-50, and God who acts in hidden ways

Reading the patriarchal narratives (Gen 12 – 50) in the context of the exile