English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

251 Colonoscopy can prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) by detecting and removing precancerous lesions including colorectal adenomas. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), defined as the percentage of subjects with at least one adenoma detected during colonoscopy, is the most important quality indicator for colonoscopy as the ADR is inversely associated with the rate of post-colonoscopy CRC. An inspection time of at least 6 minutes and adequate bowel cleansing are associated with higher ADR. Devices such as a conventional cap, Endocuff, and Endoring, which are distally attached to the colonoscope, were developed to enhance the ADR. Distal attachment devices can flatten colon folds, thereby enhancing the visualization of concealed areas. Clinical trials using the conventional cap produced mixed results and could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on ADR. The Endocuff (Arc Medical Design Ltd., Leeds, England) is a novel distal attachment device comprising several soft, flexible plastic arms. A meta-analysis demonstrated an increased ADR for the Endocuff compared to that of standard colonoscopy; i.e., colonoscopy without any distal attachment device. Several studies comparing ADR between the Endocuff and conventional cap showed that the ADR with the Endocuff was not higher than that with the conventional cap. In this issue of Clinical Endoscopy, Okagawa et al. report a comparison of ADR between the Endocuff and conventional cap. This single-center retrospective study included 94 patients in the Endocuff group and 193 patients in the conventional cap group. Colonoscopy was performed by three trainees. The demographic characteristics of the patients and technical colonoscopy parameters (cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time) were comparable between the two groups. The ADR in the Endocuff group was significantly higher than that of the conventional cap group (Endocuff, 54.3% vs. cap, 37.3%, p=0.019). Other parameters related to polyp detection (mean number of polyps per patient, polyp detection rate) were also superior in the Endocuff group. Although the differences were not statistically significant, the ADR in the Endocuff group was higher than that in the cap group for all three colonoscopists. The ADR is also influenced by physician-related factors. Several studies have suggested that the ADR of gastroenterologists, who are regarded as more skillful endoscopists, was higher than that of surgeons. The endoscopist’s skill is an important factor in enhancing the ADR. A previous study showed that, despite a shorter inspection time, the ADR of experienced endoscopists was higher than that of beginners. The main result of this study differs from that of recent studies showing comparable ADRs between the Endocuff and conventional cap. The authors of this study did not determine why the Endocuff provided a superior ADR compared COMMENTARY

Accessories to Enhance Adenoma Detection Rates: Is the Endocuff Better than the Conventional Cap for Trainees?