English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper we will consider the relationship between the monism of the divine substance and the pluralism of the parts of the continuum in Leibniz’s 1675-76’s metaphysical writings. This point of view differs from Andreas Blank’s considerations regarding the general relationship between monism-pluralism. Nevertheless, both theories are compatible. To show this relationship, we will first consider the approach regarding the maximum in the continuum, distinguishing between two kinds, one of which has not been considered before. Then, we will analyze the ontological status of matter, as an actual —but not substantial— existing thing. Finally, we will consider the theory regarding the parts of the continuum as infinite and as the result of an endless division.

De Summa Rerum : monismo y pluralismo en la concepción leibniziana del continuo