English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Rapid expansion of ancient Roman territory was apparently not followed by a sufficiently quick growth of public administration. Consequently, a part of public authorities was entrusted to private individuals. This process appeared to be mutually beneficial. Public authority achieved the implementation of its jurisdiction, tax collection being of particular importance, while publicans, private individuals, acquired vast profits. Their profits were often a consequence of their abuse of the public authorities entrusted to them. The profit growth was followed by a growth of publicans' power and influence within the society, and consequently, the possibility of holders of public authorities to bring them to justice by exercising their powers was limited. Nevertheless, the aspect of legal limitations of publicans in which the authorities were partially successful, refers to the circumstances in which the public interest was harmed. Private individuals, however, were largely left at the mercy of the illegal actions of the publicans. The texts of Justinian's Digest, thus originating form the classical period, in which these matters are considered, were analysed in this paper.

Publicans according to the Justinian's Digest: Institutionalised corruption and its legal sanctioning