English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper the author presents the evolution of burden of proof in criminal and civil procedure. In civil procedural law there are the differences between the burden of proof in subjective, and that in objective sense. In criminal procedural law there are the differences between the burden of proof in formal, and that in material sense. The burden of proof in objective sense and the burden of proof in material sense is a specific working method available to court after the evidence procedure is carried out, when the use of free assessment of evidence method did not result in its conviction that a certain disputed legally relevant fact is true, which disables the court to form the factual substratum of the judgment. A particular attention is paid to the discussion of the principle in dubio pro reo and its differences from burden of proof in civil procedure

Burden of proof in criminal and civil procedure