English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Power flow equation for step-index glass optical fiber was solved using recently reported unconditionally-positive finite difference (UPFD) scheme. Solution obtained using UPFD scheme was compared with solution obtained using standard explicit finite difference (EFD) scheme. For accuracy testing both schemes were compared with analytical solution for steady state distribution of given fiber. The advantage of UPFD is reflected in stability of the scheme regardless of discretization step taken. Nevertheless EFD scheme has better concurrence with analytical solution than UPFD. This is due to the additional truncation-error terms in the approximations of the first and second derivatives with respect to θ.

Unconditionally positive finite difference and standard explicit finite difference schemes for power flow equation