English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Resumo O conceito de inconstitucionalidade foi elaborado a partir da perspectiva legiscentrica, focada na incompatibilidade intersistematica entre normas.   O presente artigo examina as transformacoes na definicao e no alcance do fenomeno da inconstitucionalidade, sustentando que este ja nao se exaure no plano da validade, incorporando a dimensao da efetividade. Examinando a evolucao do conceito de omissao inconstitucional, procuramos demonstrar o desgaste das classificacoes que segmentam as diversas formas de violacao da constituicao, tendo como ponto culminante o reconhecimento, pelo STF, da existencia de um estado de coisas inconstitucional. Apresentamos a definicao de inconstitucionalidade sistemica, que corresponde a violacao de normas constitucionais em multiplas dimensoes, envolvendo um conjunto de acoes institucionais, omissoes e violacoes abrangentes e enraizadas, criando espacos vazios de constitucionalismo, muitas vezes com o apoio tacito das maiorias sociais.  Palavras-chave: Inconstitucionalidade; conceito; omissao; inconstitucionalidade sistemica; estado de coisas inconstitucional. Abstract The concept of unconstitutionality was elaborated from a legalist perspective, which is focused on the idea of an intersystemic incompatibility between norms. This article examines the transformations in the definition and scope of the phenomenon of unconstitutionality, defending that it is no longer exhausted itself in terms of validity, but embodies the dimension of effectiveness. By examining the evolution of the concept of unconstitutional legislative omission, we intend to demonstrate that the traditional classification of unconstititutionality is overcome, being the culmination of this process the acknowledgement, of an unconstitutional state of affairs Brazilian Supreme Court. We introduce the definition of systemic unconstitutionality, which corresponds to the violation of constitutional norms in multiple dimensions, understood as the violation of constitutional norms in multiple dimensions, involving a number of institutional actions, omissions and broad and sedimented violations, generating spaces void of constitutionalism, many times with the tacit support of social majorities. Keywords: Unconstitutionality; concept; omission; systemic unconstitutionality; unconstitutional state of affairs.

INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE SISTÊMICA E MULTIDIMENSIONAL: TRANSFORMAÇÕES NO DIAGNÓSTICO DAS VIOLAÇÕES À CONSTITUIÇÃO