English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolResumen: El objetivo de este trabajo es examinar la posicion del sujeto intransitivo en mocovi y toba (guaycurues, Argentina) desde la perspectiva de la interfaz sintaxis-semantica-pragmatica. Para ello se analiza un corpus de textos de ambas lenguas considerando la animacidad, estatuto informativo y accesibilidad cognitiva de los referentes codificados como sujetos. Los resultados indican que en las dos lenguas la posicion preverbal manifiesta una restriccion por los referentes animados, dados y de alta accesibilidad, y en contra de los inanimados, nuevos y de baja accesibilidad, lo que sumado a su baja frecuencia textual sugiere que es el orden de palabras marcado. La posicion posverbal, en contraste, no exhibe esas restricciones, lo que junto con su mayor frecuencia sugiere un caracter no marcado. La inspeccion mas detenida, por ultimo, revela que las dos lenguas poseen idiosincrasias, con la motivacion semantica como mas influyente en mocovi y la pragmatica como dominante en toba. EnglishAbstract: The aim of this paper is to examine the position of intransitive subjects in Mocovi and Toba (Guaykuruan, Argentina) from the perspective of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. To that end a text corpus from both languages is analyzed looking at the animacy, informational status, and cognitive accessibility of the referents coded as subject. The general results show that in both languages the preverbal position features a restriction favoring animate, given, and high accessibility referents, and disfavoring inanimate, new, and low accessibility ones, which coupled with its low textual frequency suggests this is the marked word order. The postverbal position, in contrast, does not show those restrictions, which along with its greater frequency suggests this is the unmarked order. Lastly, closer inspection reveals that both languages exhibit idiosyncrasies, with the semantic motivation as more influential in Mocovi, and the pragmatic motivation with a dominant role in Toba.

MOTIVACIONES DISCURSIVAS PARA LA POSICIÓN DEL SUJETO INTRANSITIVO EN MOCOVÍ Y TOBA (GUAYCURÚES, ARGENTINA)