English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Current efficacy literature relies heavily on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) as the gold standard patient self-report measure. In contrast, the evaluation of psychological therapies in routine practice relies heavily on the CORE-OM. Although the two measures are conceptually distinct, they have been shown to be highly correlated. This suggests the possibility of replacing one measure with the other - a procedure we refer to as rewiring - in service of making the results of efficacy studies using the BDI have greater relevance of practitioners who routinely use the CORE-OM. We tested this proposition using transformation tables (Leach et al., in press) to convert BDI-I scores into CORE-OM scores and reran the analysis of a major efficacy study of depression - the Second Sheffield Psychotherapy Project (Shapiro et al., 1994). Results showed a near perfect replication of the original results and examples of benchmarks concerning the overall effects of treatment as well as differences between treatments are provided against which outcomes in routine practice can be contrasted. The implications for bridging efficacy and effectiveness research are discussed

Rewiring efficacy studies to increase their relevance to routine practice