English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Following in the footsteps of Kant, Schopenhauer builds his Metaphysics of the beauty from the conception of art “disinterested”. Knowledge determined by  motives  gives to the spectator of art the “exciting” and the mere empirical satisfaction, but not the beauty or the sublime. The Genius, most potent and effective representation of the Pure Subjectivity of Knowledge is described in the Book III of  The world as will and representation  in an apparently ambiguous way: as the  Willenlos  (free of will), like that free of the storm of the passions and the impetus of desires. But at the same time as that subjected to vehement affections and irrational passions. However, it is, in the aesthetic experience of the genius or the contemplator of art, a disinterested pleasure, a complacency of another order than that of the man of common sense and science. The article then seeks to analyze Schopenhauer’s concept of aesthetic complacency or satisfaction and its roots in Kant’s philosophy.

Complacência estética e satisfação do querer na metafísica do belo de Schopenhauer