English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper we will try to explore the problematic relation between morality and happiness in both Kant and Schopenhauer’s view. To this respect, we will focus on the schopenhauerian reception of some Kantian accounts concerning morality and happiness, aiming to show the reasons why Schopenhauer either accept or reject them. In order to analyze this issue, we will center our attention in two apparently contradictory claims made by Schopenhauer: on the one hand, that one of the biggest merit of Kant´s ethics is to have rejected eudemonism; on the other, that this rejection has been more apparent than real.

Moralidad y felicidad en Schopenhauer y en Kant: conciertos y desacuerdos