English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

I will hold here a thesis that openly challenges the constitutionalist paradigm defended by Luigi Ferrajoli in Principia Iuris: the thesis asserts that (neo) constitutionalism is pre-modern law. Not only is there a deep structural and functional similarity between pre-modern law and the law of the constitutional state of law but also this similarity indicates that in the law of the constitutional state of law, rather than progress towards a legal system morally superior to the legislative state of law, there is a return to pre-modern law. A return, in other words, to a law deeply hostile to popular self-government, friendly to the government of a judicial elite and, ultimately, functional to a society where genuine equality of human beings moves away from the horizon of our regulatory utopias.

revista eletrônica do curso de direito da ufsm

(NEO) CONSTITUCIONALISMO: ¿PROGRESO O RETORNO? UN ANÁLISIS DEL PARADIGMA NEOCONSTITUCIONALISTA EN LA OBRA DE LUIGI FERRAJOLI A LA LUZ DE ALGUNAS CRÍTICAS DE FERNANDO ATRIA