English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study is to analyze how Law 11340/06 is applied by the Superior Court of Justice. To this end, it examines 18 decisions, drawn from the use of the terms "hypo-sufficiency and vulnerability" found in the thesis database of its jurisprudence for the interpretation of the law in question. The collected material is submitted to the following question of research: being the genus a category of decolonial analysis and a legal category introduced by Law 11340/06, the interpretation criteria used in practice are compatible with the senses brought by the Law? The analysis and the answers are carried out under the theory of gender as performativity and the decolonial studies regarding race, concluding for the inadequacy of the use of the referred criteria, pointing out that, with the gender as a category of decolonial analysis, one can not take the senses of man and woman in an essentialist way, which means that the criteria presented by the Court represent a risk to the senses of gender, gender violence and their combat and prevention proposed by the Maria da Penha Law.

QUEM É A MULHER VULNERÁVEL E HIPOSSUFICIENTE? EM DEFESA DO GÊNERO COMO CATEGORIA DECOLONIAL PARA A INTERPRETAÇÃO JURÍDICA