English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article carries out a genealogical critique of the Administrative State’s main founding myth: the concept of “public interest”. Considering Michel Foucault’s archeogenealogical method, it takes into account the historical development of the concept of public interest to demonstrate that, instead of providing a legal limitation of an uncontrollable Absolute State’s governmental action, it’s this very notion that justifies the theoretical and political building of a state capable of “doing things”, tautologically legitimating, in the name of the common good, its ruling over individuals’ and populations’ bodies.

MITOLOGIAS JURÍDICAS DO ESTADO ADMINISTRATIVO: CRÍTICA GENEALÓGICA DA NOÇÃO DE INTERESSE PÚBLICO