English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The present text demonstrates the unsustainability of a traditional view within the General Theory of the Process capable of defending the permanence of mere and insufficient duty of motivation of judicial decisions. Thus, using a methodology aimed at reviewing literature on the subject, based on a critical historical reconstruction, we present the problematic reading of the thesis of free convincing motivated, based on a relation of adherence to an undemocratic procedural theory. Thus, it will be observed that the function of motivation is bound to an unconscious hermeneutic reading as to the occurrence of linguistic turn and attached to a positivist legal paradigm. Then, using the theoretical resources provided by Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Law as Integrity, we demonstrate how the democratic procedural paradigm can be properly understood, overcoming both a Positivist Law Theory as well as an undemocratic process. The direct consequence is the overcoming of the idea of motivation and its substitution for the understanding of what is a justified judicial provision.

QUE CRÍTICAS DA TEORIA DO DIREITO COMO INTEGRIDADE DE DWORKIN PODE FAZER CONTRA A TESE DO LIVRE CONVENCIMENTO MOTIVADO DO MAGISTRADO?