English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper analyzes the confluence between the Civil Liability Systems of Internet application providers by third parties in Brazil, the European Union and the United States of America. The study analyzes in comparative perspective the Civil Internet Framework, the European Directive and the Decency Millenium Copyright Act. The methodology is based on the analytical technique, in which the formalistic aspects of the systematization of legal rules and norms are evaluated, focusing on the juridical order and their internal relations, added to the interpretive hermeneutic approach. It was concluded that the law did not comply with the strict liability rule and, on the other hand, the providers base their defense on the application of subsidiary responsibility in the exercise of freedom of expression. In addition, they also claim that they can not and should not do surveillance and check all the movements of its users, which in addition to being impossible, could be regarded as a censorship.

SISTEMAS DE RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DOS PROVEDORES DE APLICAÇÕES DA INTERNET POR ATO DE TERCEIROS: BRASIL, UNIÃO EUROPEIA E ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMÉRICA