z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cyrillic Transliteration and its Users
Author(s) -
Alena Aissing
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
college and research libraries
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.886
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 2150-6701
pISSN - 0010-0870
DOI - 10.5860/crl_56_03_207
Subject(s) - transliteration , romanization , computer science , scripting language , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , task (project management) , test (biology) , slavic languages , information retrieval , linguistics , world wide web , programming language , paleontology , philosophy , economics , management , biology
A wide diversity exists in the current practice of transliterating Cyrillic scripts for use in bibliographic records in online catalogs. Without knowing which transliteration table was used, it is difficult to retrieve the desired record successfully or efficiently. Retrieving an item (e.g., titles or an author's name) from a library's online catalog (OPAC) where it is given only in transliterated form can be a confusing task, even for users who know the Russian language or at least the Cyrillic alphabet. This study explores the problems besetting three groups of Russian-language students faced with romanized Cyrillic bibliographic records. It also tries to investigate students' ability in searching the Russian records romanized according to the Library of Congress (LC) transliteration table. Analysis of the test results show the students' success-and-error rate before and after instruction. The findings of this study establish that transliteration is one of the factors limiting access _by Russian language students to the Slavic collections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom