English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Distinguishing the different types of amyloid is clinically important because treatments and outcomes are different. Mass spectrometry is the new gold standard for amyloid typing, but it is costly and not widely available. Therefore, immunolabeling remains the first step in identifying the most common types of amyloidosis. In amyloid subtyping, direct immunofluorescence works well when applied to frozen sections, but immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material often yields poor results, particularly for light chain amyloidosis. Recently, paraffin immunofluorescence has been described as a valuable salvage technique in renal pathology when frozen sections are not available but it has not been evaluated for extra-renal diseases.

Paraffin Immunofluorescence Increases Light-Chain Detection in Extra-Renal Light Chain Amyloidosis and Other Light-Chain–Associated Diseases