English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Currently, in different countries there exist a variety of diverging views on museology, starting from its official recognition as a science at the national and professional le­ vels and ending with the use of this term rather as a definition of the theory and methodology of museum work. The creation of International Committee for Museology (ICO­ FOM) in 1977 is considered to be a milestone in the recognition of museology as a scientific and aca­ demic discipline by the global com­ munity, developing an international platform for theoretical investiga­ tions in this field. Nowadays in the XXI century the common official position of ICOM is the non­accept­ ance of museology as an independ­ ent scientific discipline with its definition as a “field of activity”.1 Researchers of ICOM state that “the similarities of museology with a science – even with a developing one – are slowly fading, as neither its object nor its methods really correspond epistemological criteria of a specific scientific approach.“2

museologica brunensia

The influence of Z. Z. Stránský's ideas on the formation of the scientific school of the Department of Museology and cultural heritage of Saint Petersburg State Institute of Culture