English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

(M)== W-n[Wt].). We note that if A is simple and split (so Nrd^ is an isomorphism), P a minimal projective of OTI and a a non-zero ideal of Z(OTl) then Nrdo( [aP] [P] )=a . (1) We consider here the following problem. Let © be the ring of integers in a number field. Let G be a group of automorphisms of 0 and OTI a maximal order containing ZG. It was thought possible that one of x = Nrdo(© S)zG Ore) or y = Nrdo(© ®ZG ^/torsion) was zero or, at least, independent of OTZ. (This is certainly true when ©/©° is tamely ramified see [5] Theorem 3). Cougnard [2] has

Some counter-examples in the theory of the Galois module structure of wild extensions