English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ever since the publication of the controversial paper by Truscott (1996) regarding the ineffectiveness of corrective feedback, research on corrective feedback has attracted a surge of interest on the part of a large number of researchers (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Ellis, 2010; Hyland & Hyland, 2006; Lee, 2008; Shintani, Ellis, & Suzuki, 2014; Yu & Lee, 2014). In fact, corrective feedback has been studied from different perspectives and many insights have emerged from these studies.

The Role of Individual Difference Factors in Writing Feedback Use and Involvement: A Qualitative Study of Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions