English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Data scientists and statisticians are often at odds when determining the best approach – machine learning or statistical modeling – to solve an analytics challenge. However, machine learning and statistical modeling are more cousins than adversaries on different sides of an analysis battleground.  Choosing between the two approaches or in some cases using both is based on the problem to be solved and outcomes required as well as the data available for use and circumstances of the analysis.  Machine learning and statistical modeling are complementary, based on similar mathematical principles, but simply using different tools in an overall analytics knowledge base.   Determining the predominant approach should be based on the problem to be solved as well as empirical evidence, such as size and completeness of the data, number of variables, assumptions or lack thereof, and expected outcomes such as predictions or causality.  Good analysts and data scientists should be well versed in both techniques and their proper application, thereby using the right tool for the right project to achieve the desired results.

Evaluating Similarities and Differences between Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Modeling in Healthcare Analytics