English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the time of transition from premenopausal state to postmenopausal state the capacity of ovary producing sex hormones including estrogens, progesterone and testosterone cuts down [1]. Due to the menopause the level of serum oestrogen dramatically decreases, which increases the production of bone-resorbing cytokines and osteoblasts and then increases the number and activity of osteoclast, thereby increasing the bone loss [2]. Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is able to prevent bone loss for sex hormones-deficient menopausal women and consequently is of clinical importance for the treatment of osteoporosis. [1-3] In Europe and USA the osteoporosis prevention of 25-50% of the post-menopausal women rely on HRT [2,5, 6]. In past years, however, the large international studies, such as the randomized Woman Health Initiative, the observational Million Women Study and the Women’s International Study of long Duration, discussed both of the adverse and beneficial effects of post-menpausal HRT [7]. In respect of the adverse effects, the discussion was focused on HRT induced risk of breast cancer [8-11], venous thromboembolism [12], stroke and myocardial infarction [13], as well as coronary heart diseases [14]. To limit these adverse effects a series of regimens of HRT, such as continuous combination of oestrogen and progestogen or continuous oestrogen and interruptted progestogen [15], and with dehydroepiandrosterone as a new strategic tool [16], were developed. In general these regimens confer no positive result, and thus new strategies are still needed.

Modification of Sex Hormones with RGD-Peptide: A Strategy of Improving HRT and Other Secondary Osteoporosis Therapy