English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Out of the several molecular methods currently available, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is one of the most discriminatory and reproducible methods for the sub-typing of Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) (Kerouanton et al., 1998; Brosch et al., 1996). The combination of restriction endonucleases AscI and ApaI has shown excellent discrimination for L. monocytogenes (Brosch et al., 1996). Thus, the PFGE method, using these two enzymes, is considered to be the international standard for sub-typing (Graves and Swamminathan, 2001). However, although the protocol has been shortened to 30 hours from the time a pure culture of the bacteria has been obtained (Graves and Swamminathan, 2001), PFGE remains a manual, time-consuming and labor intensive subtyping method. It also requires highly skilled operators and does not offer standardized reagents.

The Use of Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis in Listeria monocytogenes Sub-Typing - Comparison with MLVA Method Coupled with Gel Electrophoresis