English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this work we are interested in studying the results of the Winter Olympic Games, held in Vancouver in 2010, in order to propose a new ranking to the countries that took part in the Games. Traditionally, as discussed in Soares de Mello et al (2009), the International Olympic Committee (IOC) shows the results of both Summer and Winter Olympic Games in a table that rank the nations by the number of gold medals won. This is a Lexicographic method. Although this is not an official ranking, to the media and people in general, this is a summary of the participation of the nations, i.e., their production in the games.

A Ranking for the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games Based on a Hyerarchcical Copeland Method