English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Survival rates to hospital discharge for a neonate with a diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) appear to have improved remarkably when comparing reports of 82-93% survival out of single institutions to the overall survival rate of 69% from tertiary centers in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG). Others continue to dispute such outstanding gains, attributing them both to patient recruitment and a case selection bias at tertiary referral centers (Stege et al., 2004). In contrast, significantly lower survival rates of 54-56% have been reported from population-based studies in the UK and Australia despite their implementation of the same strategy of presurgical stabilization, permissive hypercapnea and gentilation with high frequency ventilator modes (Levison, 2006). Population based studies typically include more nonsurvivors than tertiary referral centers who capture only those who survived to arrival the other caveat is how to best track all those diagnosed prenatally.

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: State of the Art Reconstruction- Biologics Versus Synthetics