English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Where pain is experienced following a total hip replacement (THR), there needs to be clarification as to whether the cause is due to an infected or mechanically loose THR. The major complication after implantation of a THR is aseptic loosening, caused by stress shielding and wear-particle induced osteolysis with an incidence of 75 % (Malchau et al., 2002). A further prevalent reason for implant loosening is a sepsis due to infection of the periprosthetic membrane. The optimal management in case of hip pain is an often discussed controversy. Currently, several diagnostic methods are used to identify the loosening status of the THR and to establish a basis for revision management. All these techniques are based on imaging methods. An overview of the main imaging methods used is given in figure 1. Although the devices and technology are highly developed, a 100 % diagnostic accuracy is not available (Temmerman et al., 2005). Plain radiographs are mainly used to identify the loosening status of a THR and most decisions on how to treat disorders after THR can be made (Ostlere & Soin, 2003). The time period between e.g. the onset of an infection and the possibility to identify any changes within the THR can be very long (Itasaka et al., 2001). Hence, in early loosening diagnosis, identifying radiolucent lines or increased uptake in radionuclide scanning can be very complex owing to the difficulty with excluding loosening (Love et al., 2001; Udomkiat et al., 2001). Therefore, surgeons cannot verify the actual loosening status accurately until the point of surgical intervention. Thus, the surgeon carries the risk of revising a sufficiently integrated THR. A major clinical problem in diagnosing loosening of a THR is to identify the moment where revision surgery is required. Loosening of THR should be diagnosed precisely and early in order to avoid massive osteolysis of the femur.

Current Possibilities for Detection of Loosening of Total Hip Replacements and How Intelligent Implants Could Improve Diagnostic Accuracy