English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. It offers better quality of life and minimizes the mortality risk for patients when compared with maintenance dialysis therapy (Chailimpamontree W, et al., 2009). Little data are available concerning the impact of the post-transplantation glomerulonephritis (GN) on graft outcome (Gaston R, 2006). The post-transplant glomerulonephritis may be de novo GN or recurrence of the original kidney disease. De novo GN appear to have poorer prognosis than the recurrent type. Different types of glomerulonephritis were reported to recur in the graft with different recurrence rates (Briganti EM, et al., 2002). The recurrent glomerulonephritis was reported to be important cause of impaired graft function and consequent graft loss (Choy B. et al., 2006). Studies on recurrent disease are difficult since not all patients have undergone native kidney biopsy or it was non-representative. The reported incidence of recurrent GN is thus judged by clinical suspension and could be overor under-estimates of the true incidence (Hariharan S, 2000). Precise diagnosis of recurrent disease in view of concomitant histological features of chronic allograft nephropathy or chronic drug nephrotoxicity by calcineurine inhibitors is often difficult to be determined (Requiao-Moura LR, et al., 2007). There is accumulating evidence that recurrent GN is an important and clinically relevant cause of graft loss in the long-term follow-up of renal allograft recipients. It was reported that recurrent GN is considered to be the third most common cause for graft loss 10 years after kidney transplantation. The risk of graft loss from recurrence was found to be increased from 0.6% during the first year post-transplant to 8.4% after 10 year of follow up (Briganti EM, et al., 2002). The introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction protocols improved the graft survival. The improvement of graft survival was through the direct reduction of the incidence of acute rejection. The incidence of posttransplant glomerulonephritis whether recurrence or de novo was not influenced (Hariharan S, et al., 2000). The aim of our study is to focus on the incidence, risk factors of GN after kidney transplantation and their impact on the graft function & survival. The risk for allograft loss as a result of PTGN is thus an important factor in the decision to proceed with transplantation, and an accurate understanding of the probability of PTGN is essential for the transplant team, the patient, and a potential live donor (Choy B, et al., 2006). There was a marked disparity in risk for PTGN according to histological type; the

Post-Transplant Glomerulonephritis in Live-Donor Renal Transplant Recipients: Clinical Course and Risk Factors