English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Este artigo busca analisar as relacoes e tensoes entre parresia politica e parresia cinica que Michel Foucault apresenta nos ultimos cursos no College de France, a saber, Le gouvernement de soi et des autres e La courage de la verite de 1983 e 1984. Partimos de duas nocoes de politica em Foucault: politica como estrategia de governamentalidade e politica como resistencia e insurreicao. O texto se empenha em problematizar as formas institucionais de participacao politica e traz como hipotese principal que a forma de vida cinica pode oferecer um conteudo importante para a acao politica. A forma de vida cinica passa pela valorizacao da corporeidade, pela vida simples e desapegada e pelo distanciamento dos costumes culturais e politicos. A partir dessa descricao do cinismo pleiteamos uma ampliacao da comunidade moral e politica.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Parresia. Cinismo, Democracia. Acao Politica. Modo de Vida.  ABSTRACTThis paper seeks to analyze the relations and tensions between political parrhesia and cynical parrhesia that Michel Foucault presents in his last years at the College de France, namely, Le gouvernement de soi et des autres de 1883 and La courage de la verite de 1984. We start from two notions of politics in Foucault: politics as strategy of governmentality and politics as resistance and insurrection. The text tries to problematize the institutional forms of political participation and he brings as the main hypothesis that the cynical way of life can offer important content for political action. The cynical way of life goes through the valuation of corporeality, the simple and detached life and the distancing of cultural and political mores. From this description of cynicism, we plead for an expansion of the moral and political community.KEYWORDS: Parrhesia. Cynicism. Democracy. Political Action. Way of life.

PARRESÍA E CINISMO COMO MODO DE VIDA: FOUCAULT E A AÇÃO POLÍTICA