English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this article is to analyze the resource of instrument aggravation based on the concept of mitigated taxactivity in oral support and the possibility of having an adhesive feature. This mitigation, although in some situations, as will be seen in this study, is questionable is, however, as a rule, consistent with the procedural constitutional principle of adversarium and broad based on the basic principle of due process. In addition, the article makes a comparison between the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 and 2015, highlighting the main modifications. Through the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories and that of Minas Gerais, will be analyzed their positions on the topics to be addressed It is perceived that oral support and the aggravation of an instrument in the adhesive form are not pacified materials, which, consequently, leads to legal uncertainty. Thus, a change in the hermeneutic interpretation of procedural norms is needed. * Graduanda do curso de direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Monitora de Direito Civil Parte Geral no 2o semestre de 2019 e 1o e 2o semestre de 2020 e de Direito Civil Obrigações e Responsabilidade e Direito Civil II no 1o semestre de 2021. Pesquisadora de Iniciação Científica em Direito Civil. E-mail: analuisafigueiredo@outlook.com. ** Graduanda do curso de direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Monitora de Direito Constitucional I e II no 2o semestre de 2020. Pesquisadora de Iniciação Científica em Direito Civil. E-mail: estermoraess07@gmail.com Ana Luisa de Figueiredo Guimarães, Ester Moraes D’Avila 229 VirtuaJus, Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 9, p. 228-237, 2o sem. 2020 – ISSN 1678-3425 Key-words: Interlocutory appeal. Oral support. Civil Procedure Code. Mitigated taxactivity. Constitutional procedural principles.

AMPLIAÇÃO DOS PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS PROCESSUAIS NO RECURSO DE AGRAVO DE INSTRUMENTO