English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

UNHAPPY FAMILIES AND USE OF ARTICLE 8 FOR FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS Immigration minister Phil Woolas has attacked lawyers and charities that work on behalf of asylum seekers for undermining the law and “playing the system” by exploiting the appeals system.1 However, the case of Chikwamba v Secretary of State for the Home Department,2 handed down by the House of Lords on June 25th 2008, confirms the need for an effective appeals process, without which there would be no safety net for thousands of asylum seekers. The case concerns the application of article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR)3 and the government’s policy regarding failed asylum seekers.

Chikwamba v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 40