English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the last two decades opportunities for exasperation in the vocational legal education constituency have been mounting as paper after paper has been published (and dutifully responded to by the various stakeholders) on reform of the Bar Vocational Course (“BVC”).  This has only recently been at least temporarily stemmed by the report of the newly created Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) on Deferral of Call in June 2007,1 albeit immediately followed by the announcement of further reviews of the BVC and pupillage.  This is not to mention a plethora of consultations and papers, which have gone before, including those earlier considered by the Standing Committee on Legal Education.

BACK TO THE FUTURE – NOT ROCKET SCIENCE: SOME THOUGHTS ON 20 YEARS OF CONSULTATIONS ON THE FUTURE OF THE BVC AND PUPILLAGE