English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An anaphoric relation can be either direct or indirect. In some cases, the antecedent being referred to lies outside the discourse to which its anaphor belongs. Therefore, an anaphora resolution model needs to consider the following two decisions in parallel: (i) antecedent selection–selecting the antecedent itself, and (ii) anaphora type classification–classifying exophora, direct anaphora, or indirect anaphora. However, the anaphora type classification has received little attention in the literature. In this paper, we address this issue taking Japanese as our target language. Our findings were: first, an antecedent selection model should be trained separately for each anaphora type. Second, the best candidate antecedent selected by an antecedent selection model provides contextual information useful for anaphora type classification. In consequence, antecedent selection should be carried out before anaphora type classification.

Resolving Direct and Indirect Anaphora for Japanese Definite Noun Phrases